Hello folks! It seems that we've had a bit of informal feedback on the "Web Components" as the name for the <link rel=component> spec (cc'd some of the "feedbackers").
So... these malcontents are suggesting that "Web Components" is more a of a general name for all the cool things we're inventing, and <link rel=component> should be called something more specific, having to do with enabling modularity and facilitating component dependency management that it actually does. I recognize the problem, but I don't have a good name. And I want to keep moving forward. So let's come up with a good one soon? As outlined in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JanMar/0742.html Rules: 1) must reflect the intent and convey the meaning. 2) link type and name of the spec must match. 3) no biting. :DG<
