On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Daniel Buchner <dan...@mozilla.com> wrote: > "I am going to offer a cop-out option: maybe we simply don't offer > imperative syntax as part of the spec?" > > Why would we do this if the imperative syntax is "solid", "nicely > compatible", and relatively uncontentious? Did you mean to say declarative?
DERP. Yes, thank you Daniel. I mean to say: I am going to offer a cop-out option: maybe we simply don't offer DECLARATIVE syntax as part of the spec? Should we let libraries/frameworks build their own custom elements (with opinion and flair) to implement declarative syntax systems? :DG<
