Lisa, If you want to setup an adhoc discussion on your proposal, please let me know and I will join.
Thanks, Bryan Sullivan On Apr 22, 2013 9:42 AM, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lisa, > > On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 08:52:38 +0300, lisa.seeman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Over the weekend I put up a (very) draft outline for a roadmap for >> inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities. See >> http://athenatechnologies.org/**RoadmapCog01.html<http://athenatechnologies.org/RoadmapCog01.html>. >> The most relivent part is probebly the specification suggestion at >> http://athenatechnologies.org/**RoadmapCog01.html#**specification<http://athenatechnologies.org/RoadmapCog01.html#specification> >> . >> >> Do you think we should set some time at the FTF to see how WebAPPs can >> fit in? >> > > Hi Lisa, > > After talking to my co-chair, we believe are not ready to schedule WebApps > time for this. The draft is at too early and too conceptual a stage so far. > Web Apps generally works on a more or less concrete proposal for a given > API or set of APIs (and assocaited markup as relevant). > > We don't think the group has the necessary expertise and understanding to > be an effective place to develop the work from its current stage. > > If you will be at the meetings I encourage you to talk to *people* from > Web Apps, and explain the direction you are working in, to see if they can > offer insight or if you can offerit to them. But I think that at this stage > you should be developing this further in WAI before coming back to Web Apps > with a potential proposal for work. (There may be resistance there to some > of the things you are aiming to do, but it is less than in other places, > and there is more expertise there than in other parts of W3C). > > Cheers > > Chaals > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex > [email protected] Find more at http://yandex.com > >
