Hi Mike, All,
During WebApps' April 25 discussion about IME API ([Minutes]), Mike
agreed to a couple of actions for the ime-api spec:
* ACTION-690 - Ask the IME Editors to remove Canvas examples (e.g.
images) [on Michael[tm] Smith - due 2013-05-02].
* ACTION-691 - Smith to take back PFWG feedback to the IME API editor
(Kochi) and propose we excise the mentions of DOM-based editor use-case
in the use-case document, and the specific mentions of <canvas> in the
actual spec [on Michael[tm] Smith - due 2013-05-02].
It appears 690 has been addressed but I'm not entirely sure of 691.
Regardless, please update Tracker accordingly
<https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/users/39522>.
Also, did the group decide to not support a webpage creating their own
IME, at least not for v1?
Lastly, I would appreciate it, if the Editors would please update the
latest ED [ED] so it has a proper ToC, References, and such.
-Thanks, AB
[Mins] <http://www.w3.org/2013/04/25-webapps-minutes.html#item12>
[ED] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ime-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.html>
