FYI, Kyaw replied to me privately with "Yes, I agree" re my question if
the group's resolution for this bug was acceptable.
Thanks Kyaw for review and timely response.
-Regards, ArtB
On 6/11/13 9:46 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi - your bug is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included
in the LC's comment tracking document [1].
In [2], Joshua proposed this bug be addressed as "Resolved/Later" and
the bug has been closed as such.
For the purposes of tracking your comment, please indicate if this
resolution is acceptable or not.
-Thanks, ArtB
[1]
<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/default/Comments-16-May-2013-LCWD.html>
[2]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013AprJun/0817.html>
[3] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/IndexedDatabaseFeatures>
On 6/11/13 2:13 PM, ext [email protected] wrote:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22130
Joshua Bell <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |[email protected]
Resolution|--- |LATER
--- Comment #2 from Joshua Bell <[email protected]> ---
Not for the "V1" spec, so marking RESOLVED / LATER
