On 11/06/2013 17:59 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@nokia.com> wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the
HTML Templates spec using the following document as the basis (it does not
yet use the LC template):
<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html>
There's an open bug on integrating this into HTML proper which will
clearly happen. Why do we need to continue with this draft?
I agree with Anne. And since this group considered the feature stable
enough to go to LC I went ahead and imported <template> into HTML.
You can see the changes here:
https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/2502feb541063a3834f1ef07e2a23d0824d96914
https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/daaf6bc1e76365b6678a14b47954bcf9c5db54c6
The result is live at:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/templating.html
(plus a bunch of other places in the spec, notably the parsing chapter).
I made a number of editorial changes in order to align it with the spec,
so it could benefit from review.
Anne: Are you going to take care of this bit?
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html#node-clone-additions
Travis: Are you going to take care of this bit?
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html#innerhtml-on-templates
Rafael, Dimitri, Tony: I would appreciate if you could compare your
document with the integration with a fine tooth comb (using the diffs to
find where various parts ended up in the spec if needed) and check that
I didn't break anything.
Templates are a wicked cool brick, thanks!
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
