> Both of these seem very like the ES6 > iterator interface. Can you just use > that instead of minting a new iterable/ > iterator interface?
Again, that doesn't solve my TreeWalker use case :-/
> Both of these seem very like the ES6 > iterator interface. Can you just use > that instead of minting a new iterable/ > iterator interface?
Again, that doesn't solve my TreeWalker use case :-/