On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks.
Done. Spec now sez:
"Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this
specification must implement them in a manner consistent with the ECMAScript Bindings
defined in the Web IDL specification [WebIDL], as this specification uses that
specification and terminology."
Whoops. Seems I misunderstood. The spec actually now says:
"The IDL blocks in this specification are conforming IDL fragments as defined by the
WebIDL specification."
Thanks, indeed the CR->PR transition was made with a test suite that was
linked to this WebIDL reference, and not the other one.
That said, if you have tests and better, a report for a stricter
conformance to WebIDL, it would be good to highlight them.
Cheers,
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
