On Aug 20, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Arun Ranganathan <[email protected]> wrote: >> ii. A new static method on URL called URL.createAndRevoke has been added >> that gets defaults right, and does away with autoRevoke, which nobody >> implemented for URL.createObjectURL. > > My problem with these names is that they suggest you get a URL object > whereas you actually get a string. They also seem longish. I suggest > we name the revoking variant just "create" or a synonym that has less > of a suggestion of creating a URL object.
I agree, and got the same feedback in off-list correspondence. The ship has already sailed on URL.createObjectURL unfortunately, but we can get the newer function's name right. Jonas proposes URL.createFor in lieu of URL.createAndRevoke. -- A* > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/
