XHRs for `mailto:`? :) Kidding, though that would be kind of interesting. On Sep 19, 2013 6:28 PM, "Jonas Sicking" <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's true for <img src="data:..."> too. Technically that's also not > needed. Same with <img src="blob:..."> > > I think there's a lot of value in ensuring that all URL schemes work > in all APIs that handle URLs. Otherwise the concept of a URL sort of > falls apart. > > / Jonas > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:46 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Are you saying it's possible to use 'data:' requests with XHR? What's > > the sense for this? The data is already on the client... > > > > 2013/9/19 Hallvord Steen <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, > >> I see Gecko "fakes" a Content-Length header (visible to > getAllResponseHeaders()) when you load a data: URL with XHR. This is wrong > per the spec (which is explicitly requiring only a single Content-Type > response header) but it looks more like a feature than a bug.. Should we > spec it? > >> > >> Test: > http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/XMLHttpRequest/data-uri-basic.htm(subtest > getAllResponseHeaders()) > >> Current spec text: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#data:-urls-and-http > >> -Hallvord R > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un > > monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo > > Unix." > > – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux > > > >
