Ok, I was asking for a use case like the use you show, I didn't think about iframes :-) It's good to me then. El 02/10/2013 07:37, "Kyle Huey" <[email protected]> escribió:
> Oh, sure. I'm not saying we should drop the query string entirely, I'm > saying that blob:foo and blob:foo?bar should both load the same thing. If > someone does <iframe src="blob:foo?bar"> and the script inside that blob > looks at bar and does processing on it that's fine. > > - Kyle > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:31 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Query can also be procesed by client-side javascript... >> El 02/10/2013 07:25, "Kyle Huey" <[email protected]> escribió: >> >> Well the query string is meant for the server, so what would you do with >>> it? >>> >>> - Kyle >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Could it be procesed someway instead? >>>> El 02/10/2013 03:34, "Kyle Huey" <[email protected]> escribió: >>>> >>>> The File API specifies how to deal with fragment identifiers. It >>>>> should also specify what to do with the query string. Presumably it >>>>> should >>>>> be ignored when looking up blob URIs. >>>>> >>>>> - Kyle >>>>> >>>> >>> >
