Hi Arthur, Thanks for the coordination. The status of IME API in the PubStatus page is correct.
I will make some modification to Editor's draft soon, taking some of what Microsoft proposed [1], and some clarification about event delivery. If possible, I hope we can get live feedback on the TPAC session. [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ime-api/raw-file/tip/proposals/IMEProposal.html On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Takayoshi and Kenji, > > If any of the data for the IME spec in [PubStatus] is not accurate, please > provide corrections. > > Also, if you have any new information re your plans for the spec, or the > spec's status with respect to being feature complete, implementation > status, etc. please let us know. > > -Thanks, ArtB > > [PubStatus] > <http://www.w3.org/2008/**webapps/wiki/PubStatus<http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus> > > > -- Takayoshi Kochi
