No comments or bugs were submitted against the 31 October LCWD of
Pointer Lock. As such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a
Candidate Recommendation of the spec using the LCWD as the basis:
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-pointerlock-20131031/>
This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's
decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for
Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process
Document
<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs>.
I propose 3 months as the minimal amount of time before we are ready to
advance the spec to Proposed Recommendation and I propose we re-use the
CR exit criteria we used for the IDB CR:
[[
During the Candidate Recommendation period, which ends @T+3months, the
WG will complete its test suite. Before this specification exits
Candidate Recommendation, two or more independent implementations must
pass each test, although no single implementation must pass each test.
The group will also create an Implementation Report.
]]
If anyone has feedback regarding features that could be marked "at
risk", please speak up during this CfC.
Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence
will be considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for
comments is December 9 and all comments should be sent to public-webapps
@ w3.org.
-Thanks, ArtB
