On Wed, Dec 11, 2013, at 14:48, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Would any potential implementer consider supporting a HTTP based solution > to loading manifests?
It seems quite premature to discuss a HTTP based solution to advertise a manifest. Even if it happens to be something developers ask for, we will anyway need to provide a <link> solution. It seems that the best course of actions we could take here is to implement the manifest feature using <link> and gather developer feedback to evaluate that alternative. Unless Jonas' concerns are that the manifest adoption could be strongly limited because of the lack of that feature? -- Mounir
