On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/9/14 8:39 PM, Goktug Gokdogan wrote: > >> Is it really part of the plans (i.e. making HTMLElement constructible)? >> > > Ideally, yes. The main problem with making HTMLElement constructible is > this: What tag name should it use when it constructs? If it were not for > that, it would already be constructible, I suspect. > > Can't it be passed by constructor call? > > If it is, is it going to work with some native support from browser? >> > > It would have to, yes. > > -Boris >
