On 2/27/14 11:41 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote:
What do you recommend?
It seems a little heavy-handed to kill it or gut it. What about
putting a big-red warning at the top that it has been merged to HTML
and no longer has normative weight.
I don't have a strong preference now and would like to hear from others.
The above do have different +/-.
I think the principle of least surprise (`follow your nose`) indicates
navigating to the ED would redirect to the HTML spec. It seems like the
worst case scenario is for the contents of the ED to be inconsistent
with HTML.
-Art
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 2/26/14 9:43 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Robin, Dimitri, All,
Since HTML Templates is now part of HTML5, to help avoid
confusion, I think WebApps' last TR of the spec
([html-templates]) should be replaced with a WG Note that
clearly indicates WebApps' work on the standalone spec has
stopped and the feature is now part of HTML5. (The Note could
also be void of any technical substance as DAP recently did
f.ex. [contacts-api]).
Dimitri, Rafael, Tony - there is also a question about the
contents of the HTML Templates [ED]. What are you planning to do
with it (delete it; remove the "guts" and link to HTML(5);
something else)?
-Art
[ED]
<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html>
WDYT? Any objections?
(If we agree to publish a WG Note, I'll create it).
-Thanks, AB
[html-templates] <http://www.w3.org/TR/html-templates/>
[contacts-api] <http://www.w3.org/TR/contacts-api/>
