On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Given the spec's implementation status today, perhaps it would be "best" > to postpone new features and to plan for a potential followup spec. > Regardless, I think it is important to document new and/or additional > features and requirements beyond what is now specified. The IDB people > document their feature requests for IDB.Next in [IDB-Features]. Perhaps it > would be useful to have a similar document for PointerLock. > > If you want to document new features/requirements [and I recommend it > ;-)], besides using a wiki (f.ex. https://www.w3.org/wiki/ > Webapps/PointerLockFeatures), other options include using Bugzilla (I > think WebIDL uses a "v2" value for the `whiteboard` field) or a document in > the spec's repo. > > I've created https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/PointerLockFeatures
