On 4/7/14 5:33 PM, ext Mounir Lamouri wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, at 8:37, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On March 20, 2014 at 2:30:55 PM, Marcos Caceres ([email protected]) wrote:
On March 20, 2014 at 12:58:44 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Agreed. The exact target isn't very important here, and so being
consistent with legacy event firing for the same system is probably
a good idea.
Agree. Let's go with consistency, even though it feels a bit weird.
Ian, would it be possible to have some kind of hook in HTML to give us
this behaviour for free?
That is, given an event handler IDL attribute on some interface, we get
the HTML attribute equivalent on body element (all wired up and ready to
be used). That would be useful in that we wouldn't need to define the
HTML onorientationchange attribute in the Orientation Lock spec (and all
future specs). This could really help with consistency.
I'm very happy to add any such attributes to the HTML spec, just file a
bug once you're confident that it won't change.
When we will be in LC and close to CR, I will file a bug to remove the
monkey patching I am doing on the HTML spec.
Perhaps it would be good then to file a bug for the Screen Orientation
spec and/or to add a related note to the ED. WDYT?
-AB
