From: Joshua Bell <[email protected]> > How much of leveldb's API you consider part of the minimum set - write > batches? iterators? snapshots? custom comparators? multiple instances per > application? And are IDB-style keys / serialized script values appropriate, > or is that extra overhead over e.g. just strings?
This is my question for Tim as well. My personal hope has always been for something along the lines of async local storage [1], but that omits a lot of LevelDB's API and complexity, so presumably it goes too far for LevelDB proponents. [1]: https://github.com/slightlyoff/async-local-storage
