On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Axel Dahmen <bril...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I got redirected here from a HTML5 discussion on an <IFrame>'s SEAMLESS
> attribute:
>
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25376
>
> Ian Hickson suggested to publish my findings here so the Web Components team
> may consider to re-evaluate the draft and probably amending the spec.

Could you post your findings here?

Digging through the bug thread, it appears you might be talking about this:

> Web Components require a plethora of additional browser features and 
> behaviours.
>
> Web Components require loads of additional HTML, CSS and client script code 
> for displaying content.
>
> Web Components install complex concepts (e.g. <decorators>) by introducing 
> unique, complex, opaque behaviours, abandoning the pure nature of 
> presentation.
>
> Web Components require special script event handling, so existing script code 
> cannot be reused.
>
> Web Components require special CSS handling, so existing CSS cannot be reused.
>
> Web Components unnecessarily introduce a new clumsy “custom”, or “undefined” 
> element, leaving the path of presentation. Custom Elements could as easy be 
> achieved using CSS classes, and querySelector() in ECMA Script.
>
> The W3C DOM MutationObserver specification already provides functionality 
> equivalent to insertedCallback()/readyCallback()/removeCallback().

Is this correct?  Is this the full list of comments you wish to make?

~TJ

Reply via email to