On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Takeshi Yoshino <tyosh...@google.com> > wrote: > > We'd like to continue prototyping in Blink anyway to provide feedback to > the > > spec as browser developer's point of view, but if we're sure that we > won't > > add it to XHR, we want to stop the work on XHR (both spec and impl) at > some > > early stage after figuring out very basic issues and focus on the Fetch. > > I recommend putting all your energy on Fetch and Streams then. We can > still add features to XMLHttpRequest if there's compelling reasons > (e.g. we hit deployment issues with fetch()), but we should not put > our focus there. > Thanks. I'd like to hear opinions from others too. ---- BTW, Anne, as the fetch() is planned to be available in non-ServiceWorker scopes, could you please do either of: a) discuss issues about fetch() at public-webapps@ b) add a link to https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/labels/fetch in http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/ as well as the link to public-webapps@ I guess you don't want to do (a). (b) is fine. Then, readers of http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/ can easily know that discussions about fetch() are happening at the ServiceWorker issue tracker even if he/she is not familiar with ServiceWorker, and join it if want.