On 9/11/14, 12:52 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
In which case the WHATWG version wouldn't be "canonical" anymore anyway.
It would be for implementers.
Only those implementers that can afford to staff a team to keep up
with a moving target. That's not all potential implementers.
Mark, the options are to have a team do that or to have a team to
reverse-engineer the other implementations. Assuming you want to be
interoperable with said implementations, of course.
Tracking a well-written spec is _usually_ simpler than
reverse-engineering other implementations...
-Boris
