On 10/6/14 7:51 AM, Hallvord R. M. Steen wrote:
To test the outcome, load http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/ and run this
from the browser's dev tools' console:
document.body.appendChild(document.createElement('script')).src='http://hallvord.com/temp/xhr/annotate_spec.js'
You may have to disable mixed content blocking in your browser if the spec
loads over https.
To be clear: the expected effect of running the script is
1) Every assertation that have at least one associated test, get a light green
background
2) One or more link(s) to relevant test(s) are added after each assertation.
As I said, some of the meta data is subtly outdated - this is especially evident in the
"open method" section, where most links are off by one LI (clearly, we spec
authors added a LI since the meta data was edited). I will find some time to review and
fix such issues. Also, sections that are in fact being tested may lack annotations.
In any case, hopefully the net outcome of this experiment is that we can state
with a lot of confidence that we have a high test coverage for our spec, and
that we can push coverage further by identifying corners that remain un-tested.
Please test and comment :)
This is really cool Hallvord (and sorry for the delayed response).
Wondering aloud ... adding this functionality to some of what I'll
characterize as "more foundational / horizontal" specs (f.ex. DOM, Web
IDL, ...) would be nice. Any takers out there to help with such an effort?
-Thanks, AB
