On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Michaela Merz <michaela.m...@hermetos.com>
wrote:

> First: We need signed script code. We are doing a lot of stuff with
> script - we could safely do even more, if we would be able to safely
> deliver script that has some kind of a trust model.

TLS exists.


> I am thinking about
> signed JAR files - just like we did with java applets not too long ago.
> Maybe as an extension to the CSP enviroment .. and a nice frame around
> the browser telling the user that the site is providing trusted / signed
> code.

Which is different than TLS how?


> Signed code could allow more openness, like true full screen,

Fullscreen is possible today,
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/API/DOM/Using_full_screen_mode


> or simpler ajax downloads.
>
Simpler how?


> Second: It would be great to finally be able to accept incoming
> connections.

WebRTC allows the browser to accept incoming connections. The WebRTC data
channel covers both TCP and UDP connectivity.


> There's access to cameras and microphones - why not allow
> us the ability to code servers in the browser?

You can. There's even P2P overlay networks being done with WebRTC. Although
they're mostly hampered by the existing support for WebRTC data channels,
which isn't great yet.

Reply via email to