On 11/21/14 8:43 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 09:44 -0500, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 11/19/14 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> wrote:
Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec
should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I consider
this CfC (as written) as failed.

Travis, Gary - would you please make a specific proposal for these two
specs? In particular, what is the title and shortname for each document, and
which spec/shortname becomes the WG Note?

After we have agreed on a way forward, I'll start a new CfC.

(I believe the Principle of Least Surprise here means considering specs that
currently reference [uievents] or [DOM-Level-3-Events]. F.ex., I suppose a
document titled "UI Events" with a shortname of DOM-Level-3-Events could be
a bit confusing to some, although strictly speaking could be done.)
My proposal would be to update UI Events with the latest editor's
draft of DOM Level 3 Events (title renamed, of course) and have the
DOM Level 3 Events URL redirect to UI Events. That would communicate
clearly what happened.
Yves, Philippe - can Anne's proposal be done?
I'm not aware of any reason that would prevent us from doing so.

Hi Travis, Gary, Philippe,

Since Anne's proposal hasn't been implemented, what exactly is the plan for these two specs?

There is also a related proposal "DOM L3 Events Input Events Work to the Editing Task Force" by Ben [Ben] and followup by Gary [Gary].

What do you recommend here, i.e., Who is going to do What and When?

-Thanks, ArtB

[Ben] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0575.html> [Gary] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0576.html>

Reply via email to