On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@apple.com> wrote: >> On Jan 14, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: >> * Existing lifecycle callbacks plus those agreed (copying, adopting). > > Could you give us pointers for a proposed definition of these two callbacks > if there is any?
I added a short description here: https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/CustomElements#Additional_lifecycle_callbacks These would basically cover these extension points that the DOM already offers and that HTML (and perhaps SVG) makes use of: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-node-adopt-ext https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-node-clone-ext >> It also does not address subclassing normal elements. Again, while >> that seems desirable the current ideas are not attractive long term >> solutions. Punting on it in order to ship a v1 available everywhere >> seems preferable. > > I can't be enthusiastic enough to support this motion since that's more or > less what I've been saying for the past six months or so. I hope that we are iterating to a subset that everyone is happy with. It would be great to get custom elements in all browsers. As far as I can tell the main sticking point is still how exactly we map markup to objects: https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/CustomElements#Upgrading -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
