On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > > > * I think we could iterate towards a v2 that has an aspect of > upgrading but perhaps works a bit differently from the current setup. > E.g. a way to include an entire subtree of custom elements with a > fallback mechanism of sorts. Or perhaps something inspired by > JavaScript modules. >
Why is "Not having identity at creation-time is currently a mismatch with the rest of the platform" a problem? Why does it all have to be consistent across the board? Are there any other platform objects that are created by HTML parser or a similar device? > * Upgrading can be added, but moving from Brain transplants to a more > normal working constructor would be impossible after the fact. > Why is this a problem? Is this for design purity? :DG<
