On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > In general I agree that it feels unintuitive that you can't replace a node > with a collection which includes the node itself. So the extra line or two > of code seems worth it.
You don't think it's weird that before/after/replaceWith all end up doing the same for that scenario? Perhaps it's okay... -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
