On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Robin Berjon <ro...@w3.org> wrote:

> On 12/03/2015 11:07 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Benjamin Lesh <bl...@netflix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What are your thoughts on this idea?
>>>
>>
>> I think it would be more natural (HTML-parser-wise) if we
>> special-cased SVG elements, similar to how e.g. table elements are
>> special-cased today. A lot of <template>-parsing logic is set up so
>> that things work without special effort.
>>
>
Love this idea.


>
> Or even go the extra mile and just slurp all SVG elements into the HTML
> namespace. There are a few name clashes, but we ought to be able to iron
> those out.
>
> And ditto MathML.


Not sure what the timeline would look like for this work. I guess this
would depend on whether there's existing content counting on namespaces
being different?

:DG<

Reply via email to