On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Robin Berjon <ro...@w3.org> wrote: > On 12/03/2015 11:07 , Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Benjamin Lesh <bl...@netflix.com> wrote: >> >>> What are your thoughts on this idea? >>> >> >> I think it would be more natural (HTML-parser-wise) if we >> special-cased SVG elements, similar to how e.g. table elements are >> special-cased today. A lot of <template>-parsing logic is set up so >> that things work without special effort. >> > Love this idea.
> > Or even go the extra mile and just slurp all SVG elements into the HTML > namespace. There are a few name clashes, but we ought to be able to iron > those out. > > And ditto MathML. Not sure what the timeline would look like for this work. I guess this would depend on whether there's existing content counting on namespaces being different? :DG<
