On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Domenic Denicola <d...@domenic.me> wrote: > My argument is that it's not materially different from existing permissions > APIs. Sometimes the promise is rejected, sometimes it isn't. (Note that > either outcome could happen without the user ever seeing a prompt.) The code > works in every browser---some just follow the denied code path, and some > follow the accepted code path. That's fine: web pages already need to handle > that.
But they won't. Once web developers figure out the Secret Sauce to make it work in browser X and browser X has enough market share, they'll just add Secret Sauce and require X. And everyone competing with X will have to add support for Secret Sauce, whether they want to or not. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/