Oh! XHR slipped my mind. It would be identical :) (Though perhaps a tiny-bit easier to use.)
-----Original Message----- From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:30 AM To: public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: [Imports] Considering imperative HTML imports? On 4/16/15 12:37 AM, Travis Leithead wrote: > Was an imperative form of HTML imports already considered? E.g., the > following springs to mind: > > Promise<Document> importDocument(DOMString url); How is this different from a promise-ified version of XHR, exactly? (Not that there's anything wrong with that; just trying to understand the proposal.) -Boris