Hi Art, and all,

I believe we have enough review on the current editor's draft to publish 
directly a CR. We don't need to do the extra WD step. If implementors or others 
have additional comments, they can do so during the CR phase. So I propose that 
we publish a CR directly.



> On 2015-5-14, at 7:30pm, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was 
> published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to:
> 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per 
> process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. The draft 
> WD is [2] and the review period will be three weeks. The draft includes a 
> summary of the changes since the REC was published [3].
> 2. Update the REC errata doc [4] to include a reference to the new WD and its 
> changes since REC section, and the github commit history.
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May 21 
> at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and 
> explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are 
> raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this 
> proposal.
> -Thanks, ArtB
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0607.html
> [2] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/
> [3] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/#status-of-this-document>
> [4] http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/publish/errata-v1.html

Reply via email to