On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given this status, and in the absence of other feedback, I think the Streams
> API should remain in WebApps' charter (at least for now). Then later, the
> work may proceed (if there is still agreement an additional API would be
> useful); otherwise, if there is agreement to stop the work, the work can be
> stopped (and a WG Note published).

What would this additional API do?


Reply via email to