I notice in at least some specs produced by y'all, such as..

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/workers/

[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/webmessaging/

..there are some terms that are underlined with lighter blue thick lines, but which are not links, and are not explicitly defined within those specs.

e.g, a few from [1] "absolute url", "tasks", "event loops"; and a few from [2] "origin", "task source", "same".

in looking at the source the specs are renderede from, in each case such terms are enclosed by <span>...</span>, like so..


It seems like this markup is being used to signal that the term is defined in another spec (eg HTML5, URL), but there's not cross-spec linking nor explicit explanation that this is the case, so I'm guessing.

Does anyone have insight on this?



Reply via email to