> On Jan 9, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 23:20:27 +0300, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 8, 2016, at 7:12 PM, Johannes Wilm <johan...@fiduswriter.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Grisha Lyukshin <gl...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello Johannes,
>>>> 
>>>> I was the one to organize the meeting. To make things clear, this was an 
>>>> ad hoc meeting with the intent for the browsers to resolve any ambiguities 
>>>> and questions on beforeInput spec, which we did. This was the reason I 
>>>> invited representatives from each browser only.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> In so far as to clarify the questions you had at the last meeting that you 
>>> needed to resolve with your individual teams, that you had indeed announced 
>>> at the meeting that you would talk about --- I think that is fair enough.
>>> 
>>> I am not 100% familiar with all processes of the W3C, but from what I can 
>>> tell, I don't think you can treat it as having been a F2F meeting of this 
>>> taskforce, but you can say that you had some informal talks with your and 
>>> the other teams about this and now you come back to the taskforce with a 
>>> proposal of how to resolve it.
>>> 
>>> Similarly, among JS editor developers we have been discussing informally 
>>> about priorities and how we would like things to work. But those are 
>>> informal meetings that cannot override the taskforce meetings.
>> 
>> Nobody said our F2F was of the task force.
>> 
>> Let me be blunt and say this.  I don't remember who nominated you to be the 
>> editor of all these documents and who approved it.  If you want to talk 
>> about the process, I'd like to start from there.
> 
> The chairs did. As per the W3C Process.

Huh, so chairs can appoint anyone as an editor and then that editor can 
introduce whatever document he/she pleases.

That must be some sort of a black joke.  I don't even know what the point of 
participating in any W3C standarization process is if chairs and editors can do 
whatever they please to do like that.

- R. Niwa


Reply via email to