On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:08 AM, /#!/JoePea <trus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I really believe that we should be allowed to name our elements with any
> > name we wish, and that they should override native elements (that is
> future
> > proof), and that overriding should be on some type of encapsulated basis
> > (for example, override within a shadow root and it won't affect other
> code
> > outside the shadow root).
> I don't think anyone disagrees with that in principle, but in practice
> that would require refactoring huge amounts of code which will
> basically not happen anytime soon. Better to iterate in smaller steps.

The implied key point here is that we can relax restrictions in the future,
but it's difficult-to-impossible to tighten restrictions.

> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/

Reply via email to