+1 to publish
* katie * Katie Haritos-Shea Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryla...@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog -----Original Message----- From: Léonie Watson [mailto:t...@tink.uk] Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 6:15 AM To: Chaals McCathie Nevile <cha...@yandex-team.ru>; public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org> Subject: Re: Call for Consensus: Publish HTML 5.2 FPWD? Reminder that this CFC closes on Thursday 14th July (end of day). If you can take a few minutes to respond through one of the three proposed channels, it will help us identify the work mode that suits the WG best. Thanks. Léonie. On 05/07/2016 15:15, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: > This is a call for consensus on the proposition: > > Publish the current editors' draft of HTML 5.2 - > https://w3c.github.io/html/ - as a First Public Working Draft. > > Silence will be considered assent, but positive responses are preferred. > In an effort to find a smoother way to assess consensus, there are > three possible mechanisms for feedback, and you should pick the one > you find most convenient: > > You can provide a response in this email thread. > > You can provide a comment or thumbs-up in the issue in the HTML repo - > https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/515 > > You can provide a comment or thumbs-up in the issue in the > WebPlatformWG repo - https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/issues/43 > > There is no need to use more than one of these mechanisms, as the > chairs will collate the results. > > If many people use the issues instead of email, we will likely propose > a change to the work mode for assessing consensus. > > There will be a separate thread on the merits of any procedural change > - please *only* reply to this thread to support or oppose the FPWD > publication. > > cheers > > Chaals, for the chairs >
