For clarity, I pasted in current BR 7.1 below.  Later sections of Sec. 7.1 
refer separately to Root Certificates, Subordinate CA Certificates, and 
Subscriber Certificates (Sec. 7.1.2.1 through 7.1.2.3).  So this proposal would 
apply to all three categories of certificates, correct?

If we adopt this, instead of starting “Effective April 1, 2016 ***”  maybe we 
should say “For certificates generated on or after April 1, 2016 ***” to make 
it clear that certificates generated before that date do not need to be 
reissued.  Also, is April 1 a little close for people to change their systems?


7. CERTIFICATE, CRL, AND OCSP PROFILES

7.1. CERTIFICATE PROFILE

The CA SHALL meet the technical requirements set forth in Section 2.2 - 
Publication of Information, Section 6.1.5- Key Sizes, and Section 6.1.6 - 
Public Key Parameters Generation and Quality Checking.  CAs SHOULD generate 
non‐sequential Certificate serial numbers that exhibit at least 20 bits of 
entropy.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:50 PM
To: CABFPub
Subject: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 164 - Certificate Serial Number Entropy


For discussion:

Pre-Ballot 164 - Certificate Serial Number Entropy

-- Motion Begins --

In Section 7.1 of the Baseline Requirements,

REPLACE

"CAs SHOULD generate non-sequential Certificate serial numbers that exhibit at 
least 20 bits of entropy"

WITH

"Effective April 1, 2016, CAs SHALL use a Certificate serialNumber greater than 
zero (0) that contains at least 64 unpredictable bits."

-- Motion Ends --


<table class="TM_EMAIL_NOTICE"><tr><td><pre>
TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
</pre></td></tr></table>
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to