Good recommendation, thank you. Looks like we have 2 endorsers, Mozilla and Trend. Assume they agree with the change.
From: Peter Bowen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:13 PM To: Dean Coclin <[email protected]> Cc: CABFPub <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Pre-ballot on membership requirement update Dean, The language is a little wonky. The Applicant is a CA according to our definition, it is not something they have. Also we have two categories of CAs, Root CAs and Issuing CAs, so how about: (7) The URL of at least one third party website that includes a certificate issued by the Applicant in the certificate chain. This should cover both types of CAs. Thanks, Peter On Mar 17, 2016, at 8:28 AM, Dean Coclin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I am looking for 2 endorsers for the following: Background: Section 2.1 (a)(1) says that Issuing CAs “actively issue certificates to Web servers…” Section 2.1(b) of the bylaws lists the items needed in a membership application by CAs. But that section does not ask the CA applicant to provide a 3rd party website where the CA/B Forum can validate that they are actively issuing certs to web servers. We do however ask the applicant this question, after they have submitted their application. It would be helpful to have this in the bylaws so we don’t have to go back and ask every time. Specific change: Add under 2.1(b) (7) The URL of at least one third party website that is using a certificate from the applicant’s CA which can be examined by Forum members Thanks, Dean _______________________________________________ Public mailing list <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
