On 02/05/16 18:27, Jeremy Rowley wrote: > The one item I don't like is the "detailed message" as it's not clear what > constitutes a detailed message. I suspect whether something is "detailed" is > not auditable? Unfortunately, I don't have a good suggestion except to list > out what we want the message to include.
Remove "detailed", add "explaining"? -> The parties involved SHALL notify the CA / Browser Forum by sending a message to [email protected] explaining the facts, circumstances, and law(s) involved, ...? Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
