Apologies for not answering before. The revised newgtlds v2 file is part of 
changes to a bigger system. We have this planned to be ready by February.

Regards,

-- 
Francisco


On 10/11/16, 9:13 PM, "Peter Bowen" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Francisco,
    
    What is the status of the revised newgtlds v2 file you presented a while 
back?  I’ve noticed multiple TLDs have now been retired, and others seem to 
have never made it to the root zone before being removed from the newgtlds.csv 
file, so having the updated version would be helpful.
    
    Thanks,
    Peter
    
    > On Oct 11, 2016, at 5:44 PM, [email protected] wrote:
    > 
    > FYI,
    >  
    > There is an updated proposal to handle the RySG proposed revision to the 
CL&D policy to remove the requirement to implement RDAP. We are planning to put 
a draft updated CL&D policy for public comment before the end of the month.
    >  
    > We are also planning to issue the request to implement RDAP (on 
contractual basis as opposed to policy) in parallel but separate from the 
request to implement the revised CL&D policy. Both requests, to implement CL&D 
and RDAP, are expected to happen by the end of January 2017 (after the public 
comment period) with effective date of implementation by 1 August 2017.
    >  
    > Regards,
    >  
    > -- 
    > Francisco
    >  
    > On 10/11/16, 3:10 PM, "[email protected] on 
behalf of Dennis Chang" <[email protected] on behalf of 
[email protected]> wrote:
    >  
    > Dear Thick Whois IRT
    >  
    > Thank you for your support of the revised CL&D policy.
    > As we discussed and agreed at the meeting today, attached is the final 
version we will post for Public Comment.
    >  
    > ICANN will now initiate the process to publish the draft policy for 
public comment.
    > When published, I’ll send a note to the IRT.
    >  
    > As for the Transition policy, I’ll be sending out a separate email to you.
    >  
    > Thanks
    > Dennis Chang
    >  
    > From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Dennis 
Chang <[email protected]>
    > Date: Monday, October 10, 2016 at 2:42 PM
    > To: Roger D Carney <[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
    > Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] FW: Proposed Path Forward | Thick 
Whois CL&D Policy, RDAP and RySG Request for Reconsideration
    >  
    > Thanks Roger for your support.
    > At our last meeting, we heard from Marc, Joyce and Ray of their support 
also.
    > Steve replied with his support today and Marc had already provided his 
support via email.
    >  
    > So I have the following list of IRT members’ support so far.
    >  
    > Marc Anderson
    > Theo Geurts
    > Steve Metalitz
    > Joyce Lin
    > Ray Fassett
    > Roger Carney
    >  
    > And we’ve received NO objections.
    >  
    > Could we hear from other IRT members not on the list so far?
    >  
    > Thanks
    > Dennis Chang
    >  
    > From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Roger D 
Carney <[email protected]>
    > Date: Monday, October 10, 2016 at 1:35 PM
    > To: "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
    > Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] FW: Proposed Path Forward | Thick 
Whois CL&D Policy, RDAP and RySG Request for Reconsideration
    >  
    > Good Afternoon,
    >  
    > Thanks Dennis, as stated on the call we do support this updated version 
of the CL&D policy.
    >  
    >  
    > Thanks
    > Roger
    >  
    >  
    > From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dennis Chang
    > Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2016 9:12 PM
    > To: [email protected]
    > Subject: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] FW: Proposed Path Forward | Thick 
Whois CL&D Policy, RDAP and RySG Request for Reconsideration
    >  
    > Dear IRT Members,
    >  
    > Thanks for your review and support of this policy revision process.
    >  
    > To the initial plan that we shared with you on 21 September 2015, we are 
proposing one change.
    >  
    > Public comment.  Upon further consideration, we’ve decided to put the 
revision of the CL&D policy document out for a public comment.  Although, the 
change to the policy language is simple and it does not change the intended 
implementation, we felt that a public comment would best support the 
transparency of the process.
    >  
    > It’s our goal to secure the support of the IRT for this plan by our next 
meeting on 11 October 2016 and proceed with the public comment.  Please review 
the attached revised policy and provide your comment prior to the meeting if 
possible.
    >  
    > Thanks
    > Dennis Chang
    >  
    > From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Dennis 
Chang <[email protected]>
    > Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:41 AM
    > To: "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
    > Subject: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Proposed Path Forward | Thick Whois 
CL&D Policy, RDAP and RySG Request for Reconsideration
    >  
    > Dear IRT members,
    >  
    > As you know, on 7 February 2014, the ICANN Board adopted GNSO consensus 
policy recommendations regarding the provision of “Thick” Whois by all gTLD 
registries.
    >  
    > In consultation with the consensus policy Implementation Review Team 
(IRT), the implementation team identified two expected outcomes in the policy 
development process (PDP) recommendations:
    > ·         The consistent labeling and display of WHOIS output for all 
gTLDs
    > ·         The transition from Thin to Thick WHOIS for .COM, .NET and .JOBS
    >  
    > The first outcome was published as a consensus policy, the Registry 
Registration Data Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy 
(CL&D Policy), on 26 July 2016.
    >  
    > In August 2016, the Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG) submitted a Request 
for Reconsideration (RfR) regarding the CL&D Policy. The RfR objects to the 
inclusion of RDAP as part of the Consensus Policy as RDAP was not contemplated 
or referenced in the policy recommendations.
    >  
    > To resolve this matter, ICANN proposes the following path forward for the 
IRT:
    >  
    > 1. ICANN to issue a revised CL&D Policy to all registry operators, 
removing provision 12. For your reference, provision 12 states: “The 
implementation of an RDAP service in accordance with the "RDAP Operational 
Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars" is required for all gTLD registries 
in order to achieve consistent labeling and display.” Additionally, I have 
attached the proposed revised CL&D Policy.
    >  
    > 2. Issue a revised notification to registry operators regarding 
implementation of the CL&D Policy, clearly indicating what has changed in the 
revised CL&D Policy.
    >  
    > 3. Set the revised CL&D Policy effective date to allow for full 6-month 
implementation from the date of the revised notice.
    >  
    > 4. Update the published CL&D Policy on the ICANN website, noting a change 
has been made. Note: The revised CL&D Policy would not be subject to another 
Public Comment process.
    >  
    > 5. Rescind the notification sent to registrars to implement RDAP.
    >  
    > ICANN intends to issue notices for registries and registrars to implement 
RDAP after further dialogue with the community.
    >  
    > Please let us know if you have comments or concerns by responding to this 
list. Unless we hear otherwise, we intend to move forward with the plan 
outlined above on 4 October 2016.
    >  
    > — 
    > Kind Regards,
    > Dennis S. Chang
    > GDD Services & Engagement Program Director
    > +1 213 293 7889
    > Skype: dennisSchang
    > www.icann.org   "One World, One Internet"
    >  
    >  
    > <regisrty-rdds-cld-policy-revision - v02.1 
redline.docx>_______________________________________________
    > Public mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
    
    

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to