On 02/11/16 15:57, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote: > Oh, and I would note the Key Definitions of 8.3 > > d. “Draft Guideline” means a version of a CAB Forum guideline that has > not been approved as a Final Guideline or Final Maintenance Guideline, > regardless of whether or not the Draft Guideline has been published. > e. “Final Guideline” is any version of a Draft Guideline that the > Participants have agreed is a final version of such Draft Guideline > pursuant to the CAB Forum process for approving Final Guidelines. > f. “Final Maintenance Guideline” is an errata to or amendment of an > existing CAB Forum Final Guideline. > > Given that our Bylaws establish the "process for approving Final > Guidelines" is a ballot, then it naturally follows that Position 1 means > that all Review Periods shall be 60 days - because it lacks approval. If > we accept that a Ballot occurs before, then it suggests that a 30 day > review period is permissible. > > I'd be curious how you believe the existing definitions can be > reconciled with the Position 1 argument, and in particular, when, if > ever, we can exercise a 30-day review period.
I'm afraid I'm not following this argument, in particular the "naturally follows" and other argumentation in the 2nd para. Can you expand it a bit? Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
