On 03/11/16 18:20, Dimitris Zacharopoulos wrote: > 1. whether it is dictated in the bylaws or the IPR policy that the CA/B > Forum must produce patent-free guidelines (otherwise it is probably > allowed to include some patented solutions, among others with > royalty-free license)
I've not heard anyone arguing that this is a MUST. > 2. hear if members feel that all guidelines should cover methods and > practices that are patent-free or not. I suspect opinions on this differ according to whether you are a patent holder or not :-) I suspect that very few people would argue for the inclusion of patented requirements, but quite a few might argue for the inclusion of patented options as long as there are non-patented options. When the PAG comes, we will see :-) Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
