Yes, although as discussed on the CABF teleconference this morning, the best course of action may be not to vote at all on Ballot 182 so it dies for lack of a quorum. That is what Entrust plans to do – not vote on Ballot 182.
In that way, the Patent Advisory Group we are creating to analyze the Exclusion Notices we received during the review period for Ballot 182 can provide recommendations to the Forum as to possible changes to the ballot, which can be incorporated in a later, new ballot. From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 2:10 PM To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Cc: Kirk Hall <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Remember votes on Ballots 180 and 181 should be on the Public list, not the Management list This also includes Ballots 182, right? :) On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I just noticed that five members who voted on Ballots 180 and 181 posted their votes to the Management list, not the Public list. This way my fault for sending the original reminder on the Management list – very sorry. I will contact those five members now. **For any other company planning to vote, please remember to cast your vote for Ballots 180 and 181 to the Public list, not the Management list.** _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
