Disig votes "YES".
Regards
Peter

From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via 
Public
Sent: Monday, January 2, 2017 7:28 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirk Hall <[email protected]>
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 180 - ends January 7

The voting period for Ballot 180 has started, and will continue until January 
7, 2017 at 22:00 UTC.  The ballot is shown below.  Please vote this week on 
this ballot and also on Ballot 181.  Bylaw 2.2(d) says "All voting will take 
place online via the members' electronic mailing list", so voting should take 
place on the management list, 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.



Ballot 180 - Readopting the BRs, EVGL, EV Code Signing, and NCSSR Guidelines 
with Amendments



The following motion has been proposed by Kirk Hall of Entrust and endorsed by 
Peter Bowen of Amazon and Virginia Fournier of Apple as a Final Guideline:



-- MOTION BEGINS -



In accordance with the Bylaws and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy of 
the CA/Browser Forum (the "Forum"), the following Guidelines:



  *   Baseline Requirements Certificate Policy for the Issuance and Management 
of Publicly-Trusted Certificates (BRs)
  *   Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of Extended Validation 
Certificates (EVGL)
  *   Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of Extended Validation Code 
Signing Certificates, and
  *   Network and Certificate System Security Requirements,



all as previously approved by all ballots up to and including Ballot 175, are 
hereby readopted by this Ballot, with the following amendments.



1.  BR 3.2.2.4 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

3.2.2.4 Validation of Domain Authorization or Control

This section defines the permitted processes and procedures for validating the 
Applicant's ownership or control of the domain.

The CA SHALL confirm that, as of the date the Certificate issues, either the CA 
or a Delegated Third Party has validated each Fully-Qualified Domain Name 
(FQDN) listed in the Certificate by using any method of confirmation, provided 
that the CA maintains documented evidence that the method of confirmation 
establishes that the Applicant is the Domain Name Registrant or has control 
over the Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN).

Completed confirmations of Applicant authority may be valid for the issuance of 
multiple certificates over time. In all cases, the confirmation must have been 
initiated within the time period specified in the relevant requirement (such as 
Section 3.3.1 of this document) prior to certificate issuance. For purposes of 
domain validation, the term Applicant includes the Applicant's Parent Company, 
Subsidiary Company, or Affiliate.



2.  EVGL 11.7 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:


11.7.1. Verification Requirements

(1) For each Fully-Qualified Domain Name listed in a Certificate, other than a 
Domain Name with .onion in the rightmost label of the Domain Name, the CA SHALL 
confirm that, as of the date the Certificate was issued, the Applicant (or the 
Applicant's Parent Company, Subsidiary Company, or Affiliate, collectively 
referred to as "Applicant" for the purposes of this section) either is the 
Domain Name Registrant or has control over the FQDN using a procedure specified 
in Section 3.2.2.4 of the Baseline Requirements. For a Certificate issued to a 
Domain Name with .onion in the right-most label of the Domain Name, the CA 
SHALL confirm, as of the date the Certificate was issued, the Applicant's 
control over the .onion Domain Name in accordance with Appendix F.

(2) Mixed Character Set Domain Names: EV Certificates MAY include Domain Names 
containing mixed character sets only in compliance with the rules set forth by 
the domain registrar. The CA MUST visually compare any Domain Names with mixed 
character sets with known high risk domains. If a similarity is found, then the 
EV Certificate Request MUST be flagged as High Risk. The CA must perform 
reasonably appropriate additional authentication and verification to be certain 
beyond reasonable doubt that the Applicant and the target in question are the 
same organization.



The proposer and endorsers of this Ballot may withdraw this Ballot at any time 
prior to completion of the final vote for approval, in which case the Ballot 
will not proceed further.



-- MOTION ENDS -



The procedure for this Maintenance Guideline ballot is as follows (exact start 
and end times may be adjusted to comply with applicable Bylaws and IPR 
Agreement):



BALLOT 180

Status: Final Guideline


Start time (22:00 UTC)


End time (22:00 UTC)


Discussion (7 days)


Oct. 25, 2016


Nov. 1, 2016


Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (60 days).

If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, PAG to be created and no further action until PAG 
recommendations received.

If no Exclusion Notice(s) filed, proceed to:


Nov. 1, 2016


Dec. 31, 2016


Vote for approval (7 days)


Dec. 31, 2016


Jan. 7, 2017




Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public 
list.



A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A 
vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must 
indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be 
counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member 
before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are 
listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/


In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by 
members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in 
the browser category must be in favor.  Quorum is currently ten (10) members - 
at least ten members must participate in the ballot, either by voting in favor, 
voting against, or abstaining.


_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to