Ryan, since you're using your age old FUD "revocation doesn't work"
(because certain browsers have chosen not to consult revocation
information) as part of the reasoning as to why this ballot is
necessary, I think it's quite germane to the discussion.
On 2/3/2017 11:38 AM, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Rob Stradling
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ryan, what targets
(filesize/performance/reliability/reachability/etc) would CAs need
to meet before it would become viable to reintroduce CRLs to the
WebPKI (i.e., for Chrome to start checking CRLs and hard-failing
if they're unobtainable)?
Happy to have that discussion at another time, but it's not germane to
the discussion at hand, as I clearly indicated in the original
message. It's necessary, but not sufficient, to have that, and we're
not presently proposing addressing all the other necessary conditions.
Baby steps.
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
