I'm happy to perform a neutral third party role and handle cards and get clarifications from individuals without revealing identity, if it's of any help. I think this is a great idea.
-- Eric On Feb 10, 2017 9:13 AM, "Dean Coclin via Public" <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually we did something similar to this in Phoenix where I passed out > paper and each person wrote down 1 thing they would like to see changed by > the end of the year. I then grouped the results and shared at the end of > the meeting. I still have those and am happy to summarize. Off the top of > my head, the items included, making the CABF a "formal" organization, > changing cert validity periods, eliminating SHA-1, working on SMIME, > codesigning. > > Having said that, it's probably a good idea to do a refresh. > > Dean > > -----Original Message----- > From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter > Bowen via Public > Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 11:41 PM > To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> > Cc: Peter Bowen <[email protected]> > Subject: [cabfpub] F2F topic proposal - future thoughts > > I would like a propose a topic for the F2F: future thoughts. The concept > is to discuss where members may want to see WebPKI go over the next few > years. Given the possible sensitivities, I propose we use a slightly > unique discussion process. > > Starting at the beginning of the F2F, we have note cards and a closed drop > box. Anyone can add ideas or topics and drop it into the box — no name > needed. At the beginning of the session the box is opened and passed > around the room. Each person draws one card and reads it aloud. The > topics are all recorded and grouped. Then we discuss them, either in > groups or as a whole. > > I am proposing this because we have seen a number of references to past > meetings where apparently someone said something that was not widely > understood to be a future plan. Rather than have something mentioned in > passing, I would prefer to have concepts clearly presented and highlighted > so both CAs and Browsers can go home after the meeting and think about > them. By using the card approach it masks who is suggesting what, > hopefully allowing a freer set of thoughts. > > Do others think this would be valuable? > > Thanks, > Peter > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/nfpQsPHCpOQrtVL4WG7Pm7O6Nx4EXF > KX--W97KGufWw=?d=SFuLTpwaBUABxgJERGxquGQg5iuO4u > 0VwYwl0VFT1g4iwIYlrXbOfT4MwE-cZ5UyRkvPdnB1kTHMD5YjUD8qjqYmYV- > ha8kMONu4a7u2yFqHYvk4LUA86eeQVk4MYnfMzSIDgtmFK_ARTuEfrx1wim_ > z5pvv3Fit0H7belwFHazX65LkADZ92jqkBofbqjGxFuznPrBmoG_67TD- > IRx02V0k3isUUVdTq-j8Bmj0y-D-_RlTtHbfgL_pb7ciZU7JX1AoLccZI8- > Li_iS0nrqq4FOOZ_1y6r-tOc5sw5h-riZ3_KM4OTEuyfo_hUSoe2-mffMQy42xKnYjiHpEILJ- > dXMEz3MmSE6rE-Hl6A3QAPME60KaoDlEQn1HkgOfV2nRGOsZCNZzT5SI4k%3D&u=https%3A% > 2F%2Fcabforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fpublic > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
