On 24/02/17 11:56, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote: > The value of (4) depends on two things - the security analysis of the > algorithm itself (which is done in (1)), and the industry balancing of > risks (which is done in (3)).
That sounds like you agree that a CAB Forum motion with a Statment of Intent, or even a change to the BRs to list some additional algorithms, is in fact the next step? Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
