Hi,
FYI
http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=17855094&objAction=browse&viewType=1
Thanks,
M.D.
On 2/25/2017 4:54 AM, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote:
Recently, a question was received from an auditor requesting
clarification from the CA/Browser Forum about a specific requirement
in the Baseline Requirements.
At least two long-standing members advanced a position that the role
of the Forum is not to provide guidance or advice on the
interpretation of the Baseline Requirements. In effect, that it is up
to individual readers - or, for the sake of CAs, auditors - to
determine what is meant by these Requirements and how to apply them.
These members suggested that any guidance the Forum offers is
non-binding, in that it is ultimately up to auditors to determine what
is meant.
I am deeply concerned and dismayed by such an answer, and expressed
this to these members. I believe that this is a core role of the
CA/Browser Forum: To ensure the Requirements are clear and unambiguous
whenever possible, to provide guidance as to the intent and
interpretation when necessary, and to strive to resolve any ambiguity
in the documents themselves whenever possible.
I'm curious if any other members share the viewpoint that the Forum
does not and should not provide guidance as to the meaning or intent
with respect to the documents, and if so, how best we can correct and
resolve this difference of viewpoints regarding the role and
obligation of the Forum.
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
