Fail to issue. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Rick Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
> But what am I supposed to do if I can’t parse the syntax? > > > > *From:* Ryan Sleevi [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, March 17, 2017 10:22 AM > *To:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Gervase Markham <[email protected]>; Rick Andrews < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Results on Ballot 187 - Make CAA Checking > Mandatory > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Rick Andrews via Public < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Gerv, I would suggest simply removing "iodef" from "CAs MUST process the > issue, issuewild, and iodef property tags". To me, the word "process" means > to take some kind of action, as we must do with issue and issuewild tags. > From what others have said, if the iodef record isn't marked critical, I > can ignore it, and if it is marked critical, I can ignore it as long as I > recognize it as an iodef record. I wouldn't call that "processing" the > record. > > > > That's not quite correct. If it's marked critical, you must still > understand how to parse the syntax, and ensure it is something you actively > understand, even if you do not report. >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
